Skip to main content

Noelly Rodriguez - Prompt 2

 Name Plated Jewelry: From the Margins to the Mainstream

Today, nameplate jewelry can easily be found on any e-commerce site or platform for purchase and is worn by people across different cultures, races, and classes. However, there was a point in American history when nameplate jewelry was heavily associated with communities of color and people of the working class. What once was recognized as an artifact symbolizing responsibility and financial security, has become a trendy piece of jewelry that can easily be purchased with the click of a button. 

In the journal essay, Say My Name: Nameplate Jewelry and the Politics of Taste, authors Isabel Flower and Marcel Rosa-Salas dive into the history of nameplate jewelry and how its cultural significance has shifted overtime. When searching for the origins of nameplate jewelry, the authors found that they had been historically connected to many different ethnic and racial groups in the East Coast and even in Texas and California. The key characteristic that these groups shared in common was, “working-class status of the style’s early adopters,” (Flower & Rosa-Salas, 2017, p. 112). Even though the origins of nameplate jewelry is not tied exclusively to communities of color, its early adopters were a part of the working class. Nonetheless, the cultural significance of nameplate jewelry is found within communities of color. According to the authors, nameplate jewelry had become a staple part of hip-hop culture due to its customization that serves as, “an act of showing the world an exterior self that is financially secure, confident, and singular,” (Flower & Rosa-Salas, 2017, p. 119). Furthermore, the authors hosted events for nameplate jewelry owners to tell their stories about the significance that their pieces had in their lives, (Burke, 2018). For the nameplate jewelry owners in the hip-hop community, people of color, and the working class, their pieces represented something important to their identities. Whether it was coming of age, individuality, or financial security, the nameplate jewelry symbolized an important aspect of their life. Unfortunately, the works of consumption and capitalism have changed the meanings of these pieces.

In order to understand how nameplate jewelry made its way into the mainstream, one must become familiar with the concept of coolhunting. Coolhunting refers to a marketing tactic where marketing employees would go out and hunt for the next “cool” trends, and was brought to the attention of the public by journalist Malcolm Gladwell. The most notable introduction of nameplate jewelry to the mainstream market was a result of something very similar to coolhunting. While some may associate nameplate jewelry with people of color, others may associate it with the iconic white fictional character, Carrie in Sex and the City. In an interview with InStyle, the costume designer of Sex and the City stated that after seeing youth in a New York neighbourhood wearing nameplate jewelry, she was inspired to make it a part of the white female character’s identity, (Stern, 2015). Although it may not have been intentional, the costume designer followed the same steps that coolhunters would. In the book, On trend: The business of forecasting the future, the author, Devin Powers states, “When it came to matters of taste cultural influence followed a different path, from the periphery to the center and from the marginalized, oppositional groups to dominant, compliant ones,” (2019, p. 60) When looking for inspiration for a fictional white, female character who would reside in New York, the costume designer decided to look to urban youth for something trendy. By taking a trend she saw in a marginalized group and putting it on a white woman for millions of people to watch on their screens, the costume designer played a role in shifting nameplate jewelry from the margins to the mainstream. So much so, that some even began to refer to nameplate necklaces as the “Carrie necklace.” Similarly to coolhunters, and without even realizing or at least taking accountability, the costume designer had exploited an artifact of a marginalized community and turned it into a piece of mainstream culture. 

The introduction to mainstream culture has had an impact on the cultural significance that nameplate jewelry holds in the communities that have historically worn them. This is due to the concept of incorporation, the way in which capitalism incorporates trends from all different niche groups and markets until they are ultimately all a part of the same bubble of mass consumption. According to author John Fiske, “incorporation robs subordinate groups of any oppositional language they may produce: it deprives them of the means to speak their opposition and thus, ultimately, of their opposition itself.” (2010, p. 18). If we think back to the meaning of financial security that nameplate jewelry held for those in the hip-hop community, that meaning becomes diminished when the jewelry is worn by a popular white character who has never experienced any financial struggles. This is further demonstrated by the design of Carrie’s necklace, compared to the traditional style of nameplate necklaces. In the show, you can see Carrie’s necklace is thin and dainty compared to the thicker plated designs that are worn more amongst people of color. The thicker plates and exaggerated scripts are meant to be flashy and stand out to embody the financial security and individuality that the piece represents. Whereas, when it is incorporated by the mainstream, worn on characters like Carrie, and altered to be made more palatable to a general audience, it now represents something chic and fashionable. And thus, the cultural significance of nameplate jewelry for people of color or people in the working class who worked hard to afford their pieces or deem themselves responsible enough to own an expensive piece of jewelry, has deteriorated. 

Nowadays, nameplate jewelry is worn by more and more groups of people of all races and classes and can be purchased on several e-commerce shops. Although nameplate jewelry still holds importance in the communities that are notable for wearing them, their overall meaning has altered due to the way they have been incorporated into mainstream culture. 


References

Burke, S. (2018, May 23). Uncovering the cultural history of the nameplate necklace. VICE. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from https://www.vice.com/en/article/3k4dmn/uncovering-a-cultural-history-of-the-nameplate-necklace 

Fiske, J. (2010). The jeaning of America Download The jeaning of America. In Understanding popular culture. Routledge, pp. 1-21.

Flower, I., & Rosa-Salas, M. (2017). Say my name: Nameplate jewelry and the politics of taste. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 4(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.4.3.0109 

Powers, D. (2020). On trend: The business of forecasting the future. University of Illinois Press.

Stern, C. (2015, April 22). Patricia Field explains the origin of the carrie necklace from sex and the city. InStyle. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from https://www.instyle.com/news/patricia-field-explains-origin-carrie-necklace-sex-and-city  






Comments

  1. Hi Noelly,
    I really enjoyed your analysis of nameplate jewelry and how its meaning and implications have shifted over time! As someone who loves fashion and jewelry and prides herself on being unique and putting her own spin on things, I have certainly seen the increasing prevalence of customized products on Etsy and other online shops and own some myself. However, I have never put as much thought into it as you have here in your blog post.
    This post is very logically organized and easy to follow, and Gladwell’s concept of cool-hunting as well as Fiske’s idea of incorporation make sense. I also like how you contextualize nameplate jewelry with other pop culture references, namely Sex and the City’s Carrie Bradshaw.
    One source I think would further support your argument is Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment. You hint at it throughout the post, but I think pseudo-individuality in particular is a key term you could address here.
    Adorno and Horkheimer define pseudo-individuality as the halo of free choice, or the concept that mass cultural production gives consumers the illusion that they are making individual choices, when in actuality, they are at the mercy of the culture industry (Adorno & Horkheimer, 1944). This concept is relevant to the rise of the customization of products. I think that as our society has become increasingly efficient and technologically advanced, consumers have more opportunities to “perfect” what they buy. We see this with the customization of sneakers on the Converse website, we see this with the ability to add your initials onto your Apple AirPods case, and so on. However, these customizations are really standardized in nature; we are limited in the options we can choose between, and everyone has the same options. Ultimately, all cultural products are variations on the same thing.
    - Grace Rhatigan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jamie Lee Prompt #5

David Dobrik is objectively one of the most recognized YouTubers of all time. He is known to dress in his signature monochromatic black outfit – consisting of a simple t-shirt, baseball cap, and pants. His viewers range mostly from teenagers to young adults who enjoy watching fun, energetic, and informal videos. Viewers often identify him with his distinctive segmented vlogging style – which includes pranks, elaborate parties, expensive gifts, celebrity appearances, various types of animals, montages, sponsored messages, and skits – that are always 4 minutes and 20 seconds long (with the exception of his older videos, his break up video, and his 420th video). His vlogs consist of 3 parts – an intro, outro, and the main segment – that revolves around the vibrant lives of him and his friends.           YouTube thrives on popular culture, which can be defined as content that is “widely favoured or well liked by many people” (Storey, 2009, p. 6). Many YouTubers s...

Isabella Whittaker Prompt #5

When I think of modern music videos today, my mind automatically goes to Olivia Rodrigo. At just 18 years old, Olivia gives us a glimpse into a new era of music video aesthetics, one that exhibits newer features of popular Gen z culture simultaneously paired with references to past objects of popular culture. The two music videos I have chosen to discuss are my personal favorites: “good for u” and “brutal”. Let’s start with a dissection of “good for u”. The music video opens with a montage of close ups of Olivia’s face as she applies makeup with several loud and interruptive camera shots of fire woven in, a kind of foreshadowing of something one will understand only at the video’s close. As the music begins, Olivia sits prim and proper, dressed in white and wearing a collared shirt. She maintains a calm appearance highly contrasting the lyrics of the song she is singing. As the video progresses and we begin to enjoy Olivia’s plan of revenge unfold, Olivia’s calm nature begins to slowly...

Yanfan Wang Prompt #5

As usual, Yuka Kinoshita sits behind a small table and joyfully greets her audience, welcoming them back to see her enjoy her daily meal. In this recent video, she has three large size Domino pizzas and milkshakes and is about to consume up to 6700 Cal. Known as oogui bijyo, “gluttonous beauty,” Kinoshita is one of the most well-received Youtubers in the Mukbang community, which features hosts eating enormous amounts of food in a short period of time. The theme of Kinoshita’s channel is centered around her eating vlogs. From the familiar setting of her living room, to the same uplifting background music, to saying “gochisosamadeshita” with her hands clasped every time she finishes the last bit of her food, these elements have become part of the signature components of Kinoshita’s videos and attracted more than 5 million followers to her channel. In all her videos, Kinoshita opens by presenting the food she eats, some sponsored by companies and others sent by her fans, telling her v...