Skip to main content

Callahan Fedullo - Prompt 3

 Before I start writing, I’m gonna celebrate a little bit because I got to write about Cowboy Bebop TWICE in this class! That’s a whole two more times than in all my other classes at Penn combined. Anyway, Cowboy Bebop is an anime that follows four bounty hunters as they roam the galaxy and do their very best to ignore their trauma. It synthesizes influences as disparate as jazz, sci fi, and western and kung fu cinemas in a way that made me fall in love with it instantly. When I heard Netflix would be releasing a live action remake of Bebop, I was cautiously optimistic, but that optimism was entirely unfounded. The remake wasn’t just disappointing. It was flat out bad. One of the things that absolutely baffled me about the remake was how it simultaneously acknowledged and obfuscated the queerness of the nonbinary characters in the original. The fact that a show released in 1998 is more willing to highlight nonbinary characters than the 2021 remake of that show is indicative of how making diversity a checklist can play into the stereotyping tendencies of the regime of representation.

There are two characters that I’d like to highlight to investigate this. The first is one of Bebop’s four main characters, named Edward Wong Hau Pepelu Tivrusky IV. Oh, that’s a bit long, isn’t it? They usually just go by Ed, and they’re as delightfully chaotic as that name suggests. The second is Gren, the central character in the two-part episode, Jupiter Jazz. I don’t currently have the space for a detailed discussion of how the show represents these nonbinary characters, but I will point you to the third chapter of Ladyknightthebrave’s excellent video essay on Bebop for just that (2021). She does a better job of it than I could, anyway, highlighting the many positives without ignoring the more problematic elements. The thing to take away here is that the show imbues Gren and Ed with their own agency, their own pride, without falling into a stereotypical depiction of the nonbinary community. These depictions are important because of how they contribute to the regime of representation, which Stuart Hall (1997) defined as “the whole repertoire of imagery and visual effects through which ‘difference’ is represented at any one historical moment” (p 232). In avoiding the stereotypes that surround the non-binary communities, Bebop fights back against the regime of representation’s tendency to reduce a community to “a few essentials,” to fix them “in Nature by a few, simplified characteristics” (Hall, 1997, p. 249). In a world where nonbinary representation is frighteningly rare, Cowboy Bebop offers two positive examples of it.

I wish I could say the same about its remake. Pre-release, things looked promising, with the announcement that the non-binary actor Mason Alexander Park would portray Gren as explicitly non-binary in the remake (Curto, 2020). But the surprising absence of Ed in any promotional materials hinted at the disappointment to come. In the remake, Gren is made into a vaguely queer bartender and Ed is relegated to what is essentially a post credits scene for the season. One would think that, with the advances in non-binary visibility and acceptability made between 1998 and 2021, the remake would be able to better explore Ed and Gren’s stories. Instead, they are very nearly erased from the series. How did that happen? It appears to me as if the creators of the remake complied with our current time’s demand for explicit visibility of minority communities without considering the quality of that visibility. Along with making Gren explicitly non-binary, they gave all three lead roles to people of color, which should be a good thing (although they did inadvertently play into stereotypes like the black absentee father). But they made a crucial mistake that aligns with one of the things that Andi Zeisler points out in her book, Feminism and Pop Culture. Similar to how MTV in the 80’s “made a handful of women into rock stars while relegating countless others to a background in which they writhed, half-naked and faceless,” they thought simply putting someone on screen would be sufficient for good representation (Zeisler, 2008, p. 13). Gren’s lack of any perceivable character in the remake, especially when compared to their depth in the original, truly makes it seem like they were an element of a diversity quota that the creators were checking off one by one. Every instance of non-binary representation in pop culture contributes to the regime of representation that classifies their form of “difference,” so it is essential that this representation is “more plentiful but also less stereotypical” (Zeisler, 2008, p. 20). I wish it were true that the remake of Cowboy Bebop was able to match or improve on the representation of non-binary folks in the original. Instead, Gren feels like an afterthought and Ed is nearly forgotten.

I’d like to end this post by acknowledging that it is possible, even likely, that there were plans to further flesh out the characters of both Ed and Gren in future seasons of the remake. We will never know if that is actually the case because the remake was canceled after just one season, but who knows? Let’s be honest though, do we really want the people who wrote this dialogue adding anything more to the regime of representation?


References
Curto, J. (2020, November 19). Cowboy Bebop's gren will be nonbinary in netflix's live-action series. Vulture. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from https://www.vulture.com/2020/11/cowboy-bebop-live-action-nonbinary-gren-netflix.html 

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage. 

You're Gonna Carry That Weight: A Cowboy Bebop Video Essay. (2021). Youtube. Retrieved December 3, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_kga0BFi_M. 

Zeisler, A. (2008). Feminism and pop culture. Seal Press. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tara Shilkret #4

How Very: Heathers Over Time If you thought the classic trio was Harry, Ron, and Hermione, think again--it is clearly Heather, Heather, and Heather. In the 1988 teenage cult classic movie Heathers , these three girls dominate Westerberg High School with their shoulder pads, college parties, and unforgiving pranks. But unlike descendants such as Mean Girls, the movie touches on more than just social cliques and image issues. The central plot follows a popular girl, Veronica, who has long been absorbed into the Heather posse and recognizes its toxicity. She sees a way out through the mysterious JD, who becomes her lover and partner in crime as they begin to murder and feign the suicide of many of Westerberg’s populars. However, this sardonic comedy is not just commentary on teenage suicide; it takes on issues of rape, mental health, eating disorders, and descrimination based on sexual orientation (just to name a few). As director Michael Lehmann explains, “‘ It’s a satire ab

Isabella Corman Prompt #2

The “Clean Girl Aesthetic”: How it objectifies culture  The "Clean Girl aesthetic" has taken the world by storm throughout the last year, grasping the attention of the masses and integrating into many lifestyles. TikTok has been the trends largest platform cumulating over 750 million TikTok views on videos using the tag "Clean Girl aesthetic" (Resnick, 2022). This artifact might not be identifiable as an item because it is known as a lifestyle that has integrated itself into popular culture by being "well liked by many people" (Storey, 2009, p. 7). Celebrities such as Hailey Bieber and Bella Hadid have claimed this lifestyle as their own, causing many concerns about where the style originated. Some might suggest it is a form of cultural appropriation; however, the trend still thrives in the media today without consequences. Before diving deeper into the aesthetics' origins, one must break down what it means to be a "Clean Girl."   The simples

Zsazsa Lafitaga Prompt #2

 Thrift stores, and the act of thrifting, have been shoved down the throats of media corporations, social media influencers, and big high-fashion brands, by the hands of quirky little Gen Z-ers for the past couple of years. If you were born after 1996, chances are you’ve wandered the glorious racks of used clothing or rummaged through the bins of deserted appliances that thrift stores have to offer. Thrift stores, or secondhand shopping centers, have attracted the masses of Gen Z in recent times and stolen the spotlight of most name brands. Gen Z is now their largest demographic estimating that 46% of Gen Z shop secondhand. The penny-pinching generation has catalyzed their sales significantly. “Since Gen Z has matured into its spending power, the resale market has grown 21 times faster than traditional retail over the past three years to be worth $24 billion in 2019 (Huber 2020).  Now, secondhand stores are notorious for taking in unwanted items and selling them at a heavy discount as