Skip to main content

Zoe Goldstein Prompt #3

Fyre Festival was supposed to be an amazing weekend where some of the most famous artists came together and played for thousands of people, an instagrammars dream of great music, beautiful views, tiny festival outfits, and endless celebrity sightings. In the end, it turned out to be an unmitigated disaster. People were stranded on the island of Great Exuma without any food, water, or even a place to sleep, let alone without pretty vistas and great music. It was a millennial’s nightmare and a documentary film makers dream. When the producers of Fyre at Netflix take the viewer on the journey, they start at the very beginning. 
The Netflix documentary starts off with a journalist explaining how she, along with thousands of other young people, first heard about the Fyre Festival. She explained that she was hearing repeatedly about the festival because famous models were reposting a promo video created by the producers of a mysterious and amazing looking new festival, the Fyre Festival. The event itself was established as a massive promotional tool and launch for Billy McFarland’s new app, a developing platform called Fyre where individuals and festivals could book ‘famous influencers’ (singers, models, actors, etc.) for events. McFarland is a college drop out who had a bunch of failed ventures, but people thought that Fyre was innovative, which is why they invested in his app. The creators of the  Fyre Festival were trying to give the festival an aura that could only be experienced on the island itself. One of the ideologies of popular culture described by Storey (2009) was ideological forms. It is, in a sense, giving viewers “a particular image of the world” (p. 4). Fyre Festival not attempting to share political views in the way Storey references, but her description still applies as the imaging presented was trying to give their viewers a particular view of what the Festival was going to be. McFarland was not alone in the creation of this app. He had a business partner, Ja Rule, the famous rapper from Brooklyn, gave them an edge and enhanced the intrigue into the festival, perhaps even encouraging the people at Netflix to take a look into the project a little more closely. The idea that a rapper was going to be a part of the app made it that more enticing, that there was going to be someone on the inside. 
The idea of an influencer—a person made famous through social media, and with an extensive social media following—is extremely prevalent from the very start of the documentary because McFarland intended to use  these people, mainly models with large followings on social media, to influence millennials and promote the festival. He wanted each influencer (mainly beautiful women) to each post a picture of themselves on the beach by a certain time, with the hashtag #fyrefestival. As Ja Rule put it, “It’s free press. You can’t pay for that kind of press” (13.16). 
 The video naturally spread widely, but, as the documentary highlights it had a major flaw: it was, though extremely appealing looking, completely unclear what was happening. People were asking themselves, what is this video actually promoting? Millennials responded, as expected by the promoters: I don’t know what the hell this is, but I want to be there. The video was essentially models flaunting their amazing bodies in bikinis, on jet skis and yachts, in the water and the clubhouse. And this is the problem with social media today highlighted by the film. People just post the amazing parts of their lives, unknowing the impact that it will have one of those who see it. People only show the fun they are having, while in actuality even the models were super confused as to their role in the whole endeavor. They were also sometimes uncomfortable with the way that McFarland and Ja Rule were talking to them, as they explicitly asked one another what is going on and pulling away when McFarland and Ja Rule pulled them close. 
After watching the entire documentary, it is obvious that Fyre Festival was only “possible” because of social media and the idea of Fame. People have this new idea/obsession with the fact that they need to be famous. With each person their definition changes. With some people they want to be famous because of something special, the clothing they wear, or their profession. It is interesting to note the volume of footage that is documenting Fyre festival before it even started. It is almost like McFarland wanted there to be a movie or TV show about him and his amazing festival that would make him even more famous—he knew it would be big, though sadly for him, it ended up famous for all the wrong reasons. 
When we had our lecture on reality TV, all I could think of is Billy McFarland, and the usage of cameras during all of the stages of Fyre Festival. As Ouellette and Murray (2009) said “reality TV[...] includ[es] the private surveillance of ‘ordinary individuals’” (p. 8). It’s almost like McFarland knew that he was going to be famous for doing something special.


Comments

  1. Zoe, I very much enjoyed reading your blog post review about the fallout of the Fyre Festival. I vividly remember the days leading up to the Fyre Festival, the “supposed” best event of the year, and I recall being very envious of those who were planning to go. Looking back, I remember seeing major headlines all over the news about the complete disaster of the Fyre Festival, as it never occurred and was one big scam. I agree with you in that Billy Mcfarland presented a particular image of the world for the ill-fated Festival, in which Storey would call a specific ideological form. To add, I believe that Mcfarland used semiotic processes to present a singular, specific image of a luxurious festival on the island of Great Exuma, which happened to be nowhere near reality. Further, as you spoke of the role influencers played in promoting the festival, it reminded me of when we discussed in class the so-called “influencer burn-out.” This phenomenon stems from the constant demand of influencers to live up to a certain expectation. Similarly, the influencers that promoted the Fyre Festival were told and instructed to show off their bikini bodies and booze without knowing what they were even truly promoting. I think you did a great job connecting Ouellette and Murray’s idea of private surveillance to Mcfarland’s Fyre Fest disaster. I would like to add that as we witness “ordinary” people open their lives to surveillance, we open ourselves up to it. Overall, I think your review of the Fyre Festival documentary was intriguing and very knowledgeable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Laila Bailey - #FreeDiddy: the Rise of Diddy Jokes and their Dangerous Implications

On the night of September 16, 2024, the arrest of American rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs took place during his stay at a hotel in Manhattan (AP News, 2024). The following day, his indictment was unsealed for the world to see. With rapid speed, news of his arrest became a trending topic across almost every major social media platform. It seemed that articles and videos describing the content of the indictment were inescapable, and people were quickly made aware that Combs was indicted on a plethora of major charges, including, “sex trafficking, forced labor, interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution, drug offenses, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice.” (AP News, 2024). Despite Combs having been in the spotlight of the media for his legal troubles since November 2023, it wasn’t until his arrest that his situation became more widely discussed, and more social media users began reacting. However, the reactions to his arrest weren’t all as expected. The charges th...

Aitalia Sharpe - Victoria’s Secret: Newly Woke or Performative Facade

In its prime, Victoria’s Secret was the golden standard: their angels stood lean, tall, and flawless, intentionally setting an insurmountable bar of beauty. In the most recent fashion show on October 15, 2024, they featured a far more diverse repertoire of models than they have historically, but is it just a calculated move to save a brand that is failing in this changing society? Until the mid-2010s, Victoria’s Secret remained at the apex of its retail sector, but with growing external demands for inclusive promotion of female bodies, they soon faced backlash for the unrealistic and harmful conventions they spearheaded. The most recent show did feature plus-sized and trans models, yet the majority of models still exemplified the original Victoria’s Secret image. The few diverse bodies sprinkled throughout allowed the company to curate a false image of “wokeness”, allowing them to appear as rebranded while staying true to their structural norms. Victoria’s Secret attempted to twist the...

Diamy Wang - Sexiness is In the Eye of the Beholder

On Nov. 11, the pop culture and entertainment Twitter account Pop Base asked who should win the title of PEOPLE Magazine’s “Sexiest Man Alive,” which was to be officially announced the next day (PopBase, 2024). Despite the deluge of different replies and pictures of shirtless men, none of them were exactly expecting actor John Krasinski, perhaps best known for his role in The Office from 2005 to 2013.  The reaction was swift, with some saying it was “just lazy” to choose Krasinski, who had not been actively working on a high-profile project or promoting one in the past several years (ceejnsight, 2024). Apparently, the “Sexiest Man Alive” label wasn’t purely based on looks — although Twitter users had something to say about that as well.  “[T]hey could’ve chosen someone better ngl,” Twitter user @buffys wrote kindly under Pop Base’s announcement on Nov. 12.  The real question isn’t whether Glen Powell or Jonathan Bailey should have received the title instead, but rather th...