Skip to main content

Annelise Rowling Prompt #3


Fyre Debunked

The documentary, FYRE: The Greatest Party That Never Happened, successfully exposes the nature of the American population and producers as a result of media and consumerist culture. In an effort to promote his new talent booking app, entrepreneur Billy McFarland set an ambitious goal to host a music festival on an island in which people could stay to party, watch top musicians perform, and stay at beautiful villas. Or at least this was the image he presented to the masses before being exposed for fraud and preying on the underlying desires of the American population. The phenomenon of Fyre, including its hype, execution, and fallout, could not have occurred without the economic intentions of its producers, as well as the appeal of elitism to consumers through the assistance of the media.
At the very beginning, Fyre producers appointed famous supermodels and other artists as social media influencers. They were instructed to post an image of a mysterious orange tile with hashtags mentioning the Fyre festival and were then flown to Pablo Escobar’s former island to shoot promotional footage. The primary goal of McFarland and the producers was to create the image of an elite, care-free, lifestyle in order to give the public a taste of what they could “become” by attending the festival. Footage of yachts, tanned models laying on the beach, and partying was all shot with the consumer in mind, an encouragement to escape reality. This idea reflects the work of Laurie Ouellette and Susan Murray (2004) in their analysis of reality television: 
...Reality TV [is] an important...forum for a range of institutional and cultural developments that include the merger of marketing and “real life” entertainment, the convergence of new technologies with programs and their promotion, and an acknowledgement of the manufactured artifice that coexists with truth claims. (p.3) 
Ouellette and Murray (2004) emphasize the use of deception in the industry, which is masked by the “entertaining real”. The public is trained to be skeptical of the authenticity of reality television, yet at the same time suspends any awareness of the manipulation of the industry. This was evident with the enthralled festival attendees who were blind to the red flags signaling their own manipulation because of the false images of reality that were initially presented to them. The original footage of models and celebrities, and the ability of producers to skew the perception of the public through media, was enabled by the belief of false realities. Ouellette and Murray (2004) additionally claim that producers are invested in upholding the illusion of authenticity. Throughout the entire production, McFarland was so insistent on maintaining the elite image of the festival to the point where he lied, stole, and withheld knowledge from the public. As time ran out and financial struggles became more evident, McFarland refused to expose the reality of the production out of fear of backlash from the press and embarrassment. He continued to uphold the façade until inevitably visitors arrived and saw first-hand how far from the truth their expectations had been. 
The theories of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer (1944) help explain some of the fundamental motives of the Fyre festival. They claim that: 
The consumers are the workers and employees the farmers and lower middle class. Capitalist production so confines them…that they fall helpless victims to what is offered them...the deceived masses are today captivated by the myth of success...immovably, they insist on the very ideology which enslaves them. (p.6) 
Adorno and Horkheimer (2004) implemented Neo-Marxist theory to help explain the culture industry. They believed that both the base (economy and means of production) and superstructure (culture, education, and mass media) which constructed capitalist societies influenced one another. This ideology applies to the Fyre phenomenon; the economic intentions and the efforts to market the app and festival influenced the culture of celebrity interaction with the public and media image. Yet simultaneously, the desires of the public to be exposed to elitist culture encouraged the further extensive measures of production taken by Fyre. The public was easily influenced by celebrities due to the instant communication of social media, as well as the “success” they might achieve. One of the main driving forces of the festival was the idea that by attending, and therefore spending tons of their income, ordinary people could have the opportunity to be surrounded by the extraordinary, and therefore possibly become one of the elite. Seeing that 95% of the festival tickets were sold within a rapid 48-hour period, McFarland and his team were determined to find a way to make more profit. These measures included extravagant parties on yachts, scavenger hunts with the chance to win a piece of the island, and, when McFarland decided Fyre was low on funds, a $50,000 overnight stay in a cabana. Despite the outrageousness of it all, the public took the bait. Adorno and Horkheimer (1944) might blame the notion of false needs for the extent to which the public gave in to Fyre. They believe that in large, people have false needs, and that their true needs, such as well-being, are replaced by the capitalist demand for more “things”, or, in this case, an additional ticket to party with Kendall Jenner on a yacht. 
            The Fyre festival can be viewed as a model for the dangers of digital technologies and pop culture. As described by a former staff member, Fyre was essentially like Instagram coming to life. Posting a picture with the intent of creating a particular image of oneself to their followers is identical to that of Fyre, but on a smaller scale. Fyre demonstrated how the easily acquired image of a person, group, or idea can be completely false and have no real value. The hype of the festival, including photo editing and celebrity acknowledgement, masked public doubts until they experienced the lies. Fyre proved that the public will hold on to images of false reality presented to them by means of social media, until those images are disrupted with the real by a person of similar status on social media. 










References

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2017). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Karl Marx, 405–424.
Murray, S., & Ouellette, L. (Eds.). (2004). Reality TV: Remaking television culture. NYU Press.

Comments

  1. Hi Annelise,
     
    Honestly it is your post that inspired me to see this documentary. You neatly introduce the story, and your analysis is so impressive that makes me more curious about the it. It turns out to be a great experience watching this documentary and thinking about it. Thank you!
     
    You make great points combining the theories of reality TV with Fyre commercial and influencers on digital media, and I can see how producers invest heavily to realize the use of deception through "entertaining real" (Ouellette and Murray, 2004, p.6). When I rethink about Ouellette and Murray's theories, I am wondering if there is normalization of surveillance among audience through the process of witnessing the influencers. According to Ouellette and Murray (2004, p.9), "as audience members, witness this openness to surveillance, normalize it, and, in turn, open ourselves up to such a possibility." When Fyre Festival turned out to be an awful experience, the audience laughed at those who went to the festival, especially those micro-celebrities who was supposed to share their fantastic experience at Fyre Festival and in fact complained about it. By witnessing "ordinary" people opening up their lives to surveillance, the audience opened themselves up to it when gloating.
     
    I also believe that the Neo-Marxist theories are good ways to think about the story. Culture industry played a significant role in this promotional process, both through the implied value of Fyre Festival and the celebrities chosen. I also think of how Adorno and Max Horkheimer (1944, p.6) talked about audiences, suggesting "the deceived masses are today captivated by the myth of success". I wonder if more people with different classes or social identities fell victims in this fraud, apart from the working class and lower middle class. Your post is so nice and inspires me to think more deeply about Fyre Festival!
     
    References
    Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2017). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Karl Marx, 405–424.
    Murray, S., & Ouellette, L. (Eds.). (2004). Reality TV: Remaking television culture. NYU Press.
     
    Zejun Wu

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tara Shilkret #4

How Very: Heathers Over Time If you thought the classic trio was Harry, Ron, and Hermione, think again--it is clearly Heather, Heather, and Heather. In the 1988 teenage cult classic movie Heathers , these three girls dominate Westerberg High School with their shoulder pads, college parties, and unforgiving pranks. But unlike descendants such as Mean Girls, the movie touches on more than just social cliques and image issues. The central plot follows a popular girl, Veronica, who has long been absorbed into the Heather posse and recognizes its toxicity. She sees a way out through the mysterious JD, who becomes her lover and partner in crime as they begin to murder and feign the suicide of many of Westerberg’s populars. However, this sardonic comedy is not just commentary on teenage suicide; it takes on issues of rape, mental health, eating disorders, and descrimination based on sexual orientation (just to name a few). As director Michael Lehmann explains, “‘ It’s a satire ab...

Isabella Corman Prompt #2

The “Clean Girl Aesthetic”: How it objectifies culture  The "Clean Girl aesthetic" has taken the world by storm throughout the last year, grasping the attention of the masses and integrating into many lifestyles. TikTok has been the trends largest platform cumulating over 750 million TikTok views on videos using the tag "Clean Girl aesthetic" (Resnick, 2022). This artifact might not be identifiable as an item because it is known as a lifestyle that has integrated itself into popular culture by being "well liked by many people" (Storey, 2009, p. 7). Celebrities such as Hailey Bieber and Bella Hadid have claimed this lifestyle as their own, causing many concerns about where the style originated. Some might suggest it is a form of cultural appropriation; however, the trend still thrives in the media today without consequences. Before diving deeper into the aesthetics' origins, one must break down what it means to be a "Clean Girl."   The simples...

Laila Bailey - #FreeDiddy: the Rise of Diddy Jokes and their Dangerous Implications

On the night of September 16, 2024, the arrest of American rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs took place during his stay at a hotel in Manhattan (AP News, 2024). The following day, his indictment was unsealed for the world to see. With rapid speed, news of his arrest became a trending topic across almost every major social media platform. It seemed that articles and videos describing the content of the indictment were inescapable, and people were quickly made aware that Combs was indicted on a plethora of major charges, including, “sex trafficking, forced labor, interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution, drug offenses, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice.” (AP News, 2024). Despite Combs having been in the spotlight of the media for his legal troubles since November 2023, it wasn’t until his arrest that his situation became more widely discussed, and more social media users began reacting. However, the reactions to his arrest weren’t all as expected. The charges th...