Ania Swider
COMM-123
With music
streaming services on the rise in the United States, it has never been easier
to instantly listening to music—in March of 2018, Apple music garnered 49.5
million monthly users (Statista, 2019a). And yet, the average spent on music
festivals in 2017 was nearly 635 million dollars in the United States
(Statista, 2019b). As we quickly move away from physical record stores or buying
CDs, there is still an inherent desire to uphold any physical aspect to
listening to music. Music streaming services can do everything a music festival
can do by aggregating our favorite artists or playing their most popular songs.
It is the physical experience, however, that allows music festivals to maintain
a leg up despite these similarities.
Fyre Festival
was going to be the next best experience. The Hulu documentary Fyre Fraud
provides some clarity regarding the chaos and disaster that was the Fyre
Festival and the true power of social media.
From an
outsider’s perspective, it is hard to understand how anyone could have fallen
into the trappings of Fyre Festival. Fyre Fraud opens by unpacking just
how the festival preyed on the weaknesses of millennials, most of whom are
holed up in their parent’s basement aimlessly scrolling through Instagram. As
the original marketing video for Fyre Festival is playing, it is juxtaposed
with a stark insight into the millennial psyche. The narrator explains how just
from the picturesque images flooding people’s feeds, it’s no wonder that people
felt compelled to go. It was an opportunity for validation. The fact that these
ordinary people were watching videos of beautiful people in places that they
weren’t, doing things that they couldn’t afford to do, it made them want to go
even more. Fyre Festival created hype off the vulnerability of millennials
trying to stay relevant. And it is on that cinematic introduction alone that Fyre
Fraud viewers may slowly begin to understand just how this all could have
possible happened.
As the
documentary progresses, it adds color to the very reasons Fyre Festival was
able to reach the success that it did, before its ultimate disastrous end. Fyre
Fraud succeeded at truly unpacking just how instant communication played a
strong hand, even though social media was ultimately its downfall (Fyre
Fraud, 2019). With the rise of digital technologies such as Instagram, it
has only become easier to post without any accountability. The Jerry Media
enterprise was brought on the team to market Fyre Festival as this meaningful
cultural experience. Fyre Fraud showcases how almost instantly, Jerry
Media was able to flood everyone’s timeline with Fyre Festival, and from there,
it only spread like wildfire. The bright orange squares caught people’s
attention as they aimlessly scrolled through their feed. And suddenly, anyone
who was at least someone on social media was talking about Fyre Festival. This
coupled with their help from influencers, the instant communication across the
internet only grew louder. Kendall Jenner’s Instagram post—and other
influencers’—was the clout Fyre Festival needed.
While the
documentary unpacked just how important influencers and Instagram was for Fyre
Festival, one can’t help but see just how much John Fiske’s ideas from Understanding
Popular Culture are relevant within the context of Fyre Festival. Fiske
argues that all popular culture is a struggle between the power-bloc and the
people. To him, it is not the content of popular culture or its production that
is important, but rather, the processes of meaning making attached to that
cultural artifact that are important (Fiske, 2001). Fyre Festival attached
meaning by using influencers and creating a new reality. The documentary spoke
to the millennial generation having seen so much pain through media
technologies, for example, 9/11, and has constructed their vision of the world
through media, that now, they want to construct their own reality. Fyre
Festival was able to prey off of this. As Fiske argues, “Popular culture is
made by the people, not imposed upon them…” (Fiske, 2001, p. 25). Billy
McFarland, a millennial himself, was very much so aware of the importance of
influencers and being relevant. In creating the festival, he sought to give it meaning
by using influencers and constructing this fantasy for weak and vulnerable
millennials. Fiske speaks to this notion of the weak versus the strong within
popular culture and makes a defense for the weak noting that it is them that
matter the most in popular culture (Fiske, 2001). Popular culture is made by
the strong to be consumed by the weak. Fyre Festival gained its hype and
notoriety because its strong producers silenced any dissenters and it was able
to produce this ideal fantasy image that the weak consumers couldn’t resist.
And so, for the weak millennial, “…when an opportunity presents itself to get
out of your parent’s basement and be a part of something culturally relevant,
you’re gonna absolutely jump at that” (Fyre Fraud, 2019).
Just as quickly
as this talk about Fyre Festival could be sparked, it was also silenced. Fyre
Fraud brought attention to the very ways in which Fyre Festival maintained
this ideal image of this fantasy experience. One of the speakers in the
documentary was the face behind the anonymous Twitter page “Fyre Fraud”. As he
began to post tweets sharing the truth about Fyre Festival or tried to get
articles published about the truth, the Fyre team only hit back harder. Oren
Aks describes how certain words were blocked from the comments of the Fyre
Instagram posts. If anyone tried to ask any question about the festival, their
comments were deleted, and their accounts were blocked. For any dissenting
articles published, the Fyre team attacked back with sensationalized articles
hyping up the varying artists and influencers that would be in ‘attendance’. Although
Christian Lorentzen speaks mostly within the context of book reviewing, he
makes a relevant argument. We have become hostile to hostility. We no longer
have an appetite for anything negative, solely positive things. And thus, there
is no time for contemplation and only reaction (Lorentzen, 2019). This has significant
relevance within Fyre Festival. It is easier to create and live in this perfect
fantasy rather than addressing any of the problems at hand. Rather than ever
trying to address any problems or questions, McFarland and his team only wanted
to focus on the immediate fantasy and continue to regurgitate this false
fantasy. Influencer culture only continues to perpetuate this idea. For Alyssa
Lynch, one of the few influencers who attended, her experience seemed
perfect—even if it was only like that for a few hours. Her time in a villa was
far different than the hundreds of relief tents everyone else had. This further
speaks to influencer culture where people perceive social media as a perfect
fantasy, and this is exactly what Fyre Festival preyed upon, because to the
creators, it was only the influencers that truly mattered.
Ultimately, Fyre
Festival never stood a chance. Beyond just it’s unrealistic timeline, it was
built off a weak base. Social media within the context of digital technologies is
extremely uncertain and the epitome of ‘don’t believe everything you see
online’. Fyre Festival fell victim to these flaws of social media because it
was born and grown on social media. We can, however, now see just how uncertain
digital media technologies truly are. As they continue to grow and develop, we
must remember that they are not the end all be all of popular culture, because
the very things they perpetuate are merely a fantasy.
References
Average Spend on Music Festivals in 2017.
(2019, February 12). Retrieved October 8, 2019, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/756236/spending-music-festivals/.
Fiske, J. (2001). Understanding Popular
Culture. doi: 10.4324/9780203837177
Lorentzen, C. (2019, March 19). [Criticism]
Like This or Die. Retrieved from
https://harpers.org/archive/2019/04/like-this-or-die/.
Top U.S. Music Streaming Services by Users
2018. (2019, August 9). Retrieved October 8, 2019, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/798125/most-popular-us-music-streaming-services-ranked-by-audience/.
I thought your analysis of the Fyre Fraud documentary was truly fascinating. I specifically enjoyed how you brought our lessons from Fiske into your examination of the film. For my blog post, I actually watched the Netflix documentary about Fyre Festival, so it was very interesting to contrast the two different documentaries. I think it would be really interesting if another one of the blog post prompts were to compare the two different documentaries.
ReplyDeleteOn another note, your blog post analyzed much different content than mine. I thought this was so interesting as you saw the documentary in a different way than me. Your analysis of Fiske’s argument as compared to the documentary made me think of our lectures and readings about reality television. At one point in the Netflix documentary McFarland is quoted as saying, “We are selling a pipe dream to your average loser.” It is this idea of promoting a high class, drama filmed personality such as the models in the promo videos for the festival that attracts viewers. Oullette and Murray analyze how consumers suspend disbelief in a product or television show to maintain an ideal image in their head. This compares to Fiske’s argument as popular culture is promoted and created “by the people,” and for the people. The festival goers saw the potential for themselves to be just like these celebrities, and thus created the phenomenon that was the festival.
Furthermore, I really enjoyed your point about how social media played a role in all of this. I think that was something implied in my own blog post, but not specifically mentioned.
This comment was made by Henry Katz ^
Delete