Chappell
Roan, born Kayleigh Rose Amstutz, has rapidly emerged as a queer music icon.
Although she’s been creating music for nearly a decade — spending five of those
years with Atlantic Records — her breakthrough came in late 2023. Over nine
months, her monthly Spotify listeners skyrocketed from under 1 million to
nearly 21 million. Roan’s 80s-inspired vocals and unapologetic representation
of lesbians in mainstream music have drawn both praise and controversy. But
it’s not just her talent that’s making headlines: it’s her rejection of the
“rules” of celebrity culture.
Roan’s
most notable controversy erupted after she posted a TikTok about the 2024
presidential election. Her video came in response to criticism for refusing to
endorse a candidate during a previous interview with The Guardian. While her comments were indeed polarizing, the
backlash she faced went beyond fair critique. Social media users flocked to
TikTok and X, blasting her with accusations that she “needs PR training” and
bitterly claiming she should have stayed “gay famous.” Shortly after, Roan
canceled her appearances at the All Things Go festivals in Washington, D.C. and
New York City, citing mental health needs. Instead of sympathy, she was met
with accusations of being unfit for fame.
This
pattern of backlash highlights more than one artist’s struggles; it exposes a
deep cultural discomfort with celebrities who challenge the public’s
long-standing expectations. By rejecting traditional norms and speaking openly
about her bipolar II disorder, Roan disrupts a celebrity industry built on
control, commodification, and polished perfection — an industry in desperate
need of change.
Roan’s
refusal to grant the public constant access to her life has further identified
her as a polarizing figure. She’s openly expressed a dislike for invasive
photography and has asked fans not to use her non-stage name. In doing so,
she’s pushing back against an industry that profits from the commodification of
celebrity personas. As Graeme Turner explains, this expectation of access is
not new. The rise of candid celebrity images in the late 19th century
established a cultural obsession with the private lives of public figures,
turning their most personal moments into commodities (Turner, 2014, p.
144-147). Today’s digital landscape has only amplified this, making celebrity
content readily accessible at all times. Roan’s resistance to this cycle —
refusing to be endlessly available or “perfect” — challenges the public’s idea
of what it means to be famous. Unsurprisingly, this makes many uncomfortable.
The
backlash Roan faces mirrors the treatment of other stars, like Britney Spears,
who’ve been punished for not fitting neatly into the industry’s mold.
Researcher Akhil Vaidya and author Jessa Lingel note how media coverage of
Spears’ mental health struggles often turned her challenges into fuel for a
ridicule fire, painting her as out of control rather than as someone navigating
personal hardships in solitude (Vaidya & Lingel, 2024, p. 1-2). Similarly,
Roan’s openness about her bipolar II disorder — from discussing hypomania
during the release of her single “Naked in Manhattan” to sharing her
experiences in intensive outpatient therapy — has been met with judgment rather
than understanding.
Why
does this discomfort persist? As journalist and author Maya Phillips explains,
media representations of mental illness tend to flatten complexity, reducing
disorders to “amorphous” stereotypes or tidy narratives that don’t accurately
portray multi-faceted struggles and strengths (Phillips, 2022, p. 183). These
portrayals keep mental illness taboo and misunderstood, leaving the public
unprepared to engage with genuine, unfiltered accounts like Roan’s. When her
symptoms manifest publicly, they’re misinterpreted as erratic or unprofessional
rather than seen as part of a larger struggle. This stigma perpetuates a system
that polices not only fame but individuality. It also contributes to the
running idea that illness is solely a struggle and not a strength.
This
issue undoubtedly runs deeper than celebrity culture. It reveals how society
continues to cling to harmful narratives about perfection and control. For
decades, stars have been treated as commodities rather than people, expected to
perform without flaw and suppress their struggles. Roan’s refusal to conform to
these expectations isn’t just bold — it’s necessary. By prioritizing her mental
health and authenticity over industry norms, she’s paving the way for a more
compassionate and realistic understanding of fame for the musical generations
that follow. Given the role of celebrities in influencing society, likely also
for generations of youth to come.
Her
efforts are not about gaining more notoriety but about creating space for
future artists to exist as their full, complex selves. At its core, her
experience serves as a reminder that celebrities are absolutely not products to
be used for gossip and perfectionist desires. They are human beings with lives
as complicated as our own. Roan’s rejection of a broken system shows us what’s
possible when we prioritize mental health and authenticity over image,
regardless of “cost.” The question isn’t whether we should embrace her approach
but whether we’re ready to confront the outdated, harmful ideals that her
actions expose. Fame doesn’t have to mean perfection, and Roan is proving that
it shouldn’t.
References
The
Guardian. (2024, September 26). Chappell
Roan isn't endorsing Kamala Harris. She's taking a stand for critical thinking
instead. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/sep/25/chappell-roan-isnt-endorsing-kamala-harris-shes-taking-a-stand-for-critical-thinking-instead
The
Guardian. (2024, September 27). Chappell
Roan cancels US festival appearance: 'Things have gotten really overwhelming'.
The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/sep/27/chappell-roan-cancels-us-festival
OpenAI.
(2023). ChatGPT* (Feb 13 version)
[Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
*Used
to reduce redundancy in argument paragraphs (used to find synonyms for specific
words that were repeated numerous times) and reduce initial draft that was
roughly 200 over word count (suggested ways to rephrase my sentences to be less
words). Analysis and argument is original and my own.
Phillips,
M. (2022). Nerd: Adventures in Fandom
from This Universe to the Multiverse. Atria Books.
https://canvas.upenn.edu/courses/1788301/assignments/syllabus
Turner,
G. (2014). Is celebrity news, news? Sage
Journals, 15(2), 144-152. https://canvas.upenn.edu/courses/1788301/files/135308051?wrap=1
USA
Today. (2024, October 2). Chappell Roan,
bipolar disorder and how we mistreat artists. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2024/10/02/chappell-roan-backlash-bipolar-disorder-mental-health/75469814007/
Vaidya,
A., & Lingel, J. (2024). #Freebritney: strategies of counternarratives and
self-regulation in digital feminist counterpublics. Feminist Media Studies.
This was such an insightful piece on Chappell Roan and her approach to a toxic industry. In addition to Roan being used as a commodity, it is also clear that her stance on mental health and celebrity treatment by the public is a representation of the feminist counter-public she has built. A counter-public is "public conversations that emphasize narratives that are alternative to mainstream conversation." The singer is honest about her mental health diagnosis and distaste for celebrity news, opening an avenue for fans and other celebrities alike to create conversations around mental health and the invasion of their privacy. Feminist counterpublics are interested in representation and reframing narratives about artists. These counterpublics call for fans and paparazzi to respect celebrities' boundaries and deconstruct how women should "behave" in the media. Roan is brazen and assertive, causing media outlets and social media to accuse her of being aggressive, distasteful, and unfit for fame. This leads to a wildfire of conversations on Twitter and TikTok in defense of the singer. These narratives reframe her aggressiveness as assertiveness, not to have her boundaries disrespected, and to advocate for herself. Her fans argue that it is time for someone to stand up to the invasive nature of being a celebrity and that she will change how the public interacts with society.
ReplyDelete