The Modernization of Gossip Girl
Gossip Girl is a television drama that follows the lives of privileged teenagers living on the Upper East Side of New York City. The main premise of the show is an anonymous blogger, who blogs under the alias of “Gossip Girl” and reveals secrets about the lives of teenagers. The original show aired from 2007 to 2012 and features the various romances, financial struggles, and scandalous secrets of a group of students throughout their high school and college years. I recently watched the 2020 reboot of Gossip Girl. It fascinated me how the characters’ personalities were similar to the original cast, but their appearances were wildly different. I could easily match the characters up by personality traits; Serena is Julien and Chuck is Max, but instead of all straight, white characters, the reboot is much more diverse. The premise of the reboot was very similar to the original but the use of technology and diversity gave the show an upgrade.
In the first Gossip Girl characters had flip phones and they had to use desktop computers to access the “Gossip Girl” blog. In the reboot, all of the characters have new iPhones which makes cyberbullying and spreading rumors much more common. Walter Benjamin is a theorist who focused on how technology changed all forms of art (Benjamin, 1936). Technology is one of the main differences between the original and the reboot. Benjamin says, “technical reproduction can put the copy of the original into situations that would be out of reach for the original itself” (Benjamin, 1936, p. 50). Instead of a blog that could only be accessed by computer, “Gossip Girl” has become a form of mass media and is available on Instagram and Twitter. Also, the advancements of photography are another vast difference between the reboot and the original. In the reboot of Gossip Girl, the use of smartphones with cameras made cyberbullying a common occurrence. Any “tip” about gossip sent to “Gossip Girl” was accompanied by a incriminating picture or video. For example a video was sent of one character (Zoya) vandalizing school property and being expelled, this was something that no one at her new school knew about and made it humiliating when everyone saw the video. This was not seen in the original Gossip Girl, the reboots usage of photographs gave context and evidence to the written accounts and rumors. Benjamin’s theories on technology changing art forms analyze the changes in the two Gossip Girls because it shows how the use of smartphones and photography can drastically change a group of teenagers' lives. The original Gossip Girl was a blog that lacked evidence and was not easily accessible. The written rumors and drama affected the teenagers' lives, but the blog was not nearly as harmful as the version utilizing technological advancements as seen in the reboot.
Another theory that analyzes the difference between the original Gossip Girl and the reboot is Stuart Hall’s theories on stereotypes and dialogic differences. Dialogic difference explains how social norms develop over time (Hall, 1997). In the original Gossip Girl, all of the characters were straight and white, they were stereotypical privileged New York teenagers. Only one character (Dan) had financial struggles, otherwise, the characters were all very similar. Rarely did any of the drama on the original “Gossip Girl” blog involve race, sexuality, or social class. For example in the original of Gossip Girl, a character (Eric) is gay and that was used as a weapon. He was sent to a mental institution and was ostracized by other characters. This is something that would never happen in the reboot. Diaologic difference shows how being gay has a whole new meaning, instead of something that people are trying to “fix”, it is now something that is accepted and celebrated. Stereotypes are something or someone being reduced to a few essentials and simplified to a few characteristics (Hall, 1997). The reboot defies the original stereotypical mold and shows a diverse set of characters. For example in the reboot the main character (Julien) is Black and other main characters are Asian, Gay, Bisexual, and show different socioc-economic classes. The reboot also defies the stereotype of an elite Upper East Sider. In the original Gossip Girl the character and their parents flaunted their money, using it for their own personal gain. Chuck only rode around in limos, Serena and Blaire lived in Penthouses, and their parents traveled by private jets. In the reboot the characters are still wealthy but have less self-absorded mindsets. Characters Obie and Zoya buy supplies for local schools and often have deep talks about classism. When workers were stealing money from Obie’s father, he greets them with donuts and treats the workers as equals. Hall’s theories on stereotypes and the dialogic difference show how the look of the characters on the two shows has developed over time and has created new social norms.
The 2020 Gossip Girl reboot differs from the original because of the drastic changes in technology in this time and the diversity of the characters and topics. Walter Benjamin's theories on the advancement of technology show how modern technology can revolutionize a television show. Due to this use of technology the 2020 “Gossip Girl” blog was much more accessible to the school students and included pictures which led to bigger backlash and more drama than the original show. This use of new technology, as well as a more diverse cast, led to a wider variety of topics being discussed. Stuart Hall’s theory of stereotypes and dialogic difference elaborates on this change. The reboot of Gossip Girl portrays less stereotypical elite New York teenagers, instead, the cast is much more diverse. This new cast of characters made it possible for new topics to be discussed on the “Gossip Girl” blog, such as racial issues and sexual orientation. The reboot of Gossip Girl has modernized the original premise of the show and given it a new look with diverse characters and updated technology.
Hi Isabelle,
ReplyDeleteIt’s interesting to hear the differences between the new and original Gossip Girl series since I only watched the original version. I can definitely see how strong of an impact technology can make on the show and the characters’ lives with the constant presence of our phones in our daily lives and the power of videos and images. It’s also great to hear there is more diverse representation of character identities in the reboot, since the original was very lacking, but when I read your opinion on this section, it reminded me of Zeizler’s article on popular feminism. Specifically, pop culture and shows like Gossip Girl can help us understand different politics, but there are limitations to how far of an impact these displays of feminism or diverse representation actually make. In production, more diverse people are involved in the creation of the content, but this doesn’t guarantee the existence of more equitable relationships onstage or offstage. More related to your post, representation on screen doesn’t always mean the content is more progressive when, for example, it only contributes to tokenism. You mention that there are main characters that are Black, Asian, Gay and Bisexual, and I wonder if the producers ever play into their relative stereotypes and perpetuate them in any scenes. Nonetheless, I agree with you that the new cast of characters with new, diverse identities allows more room for important topics to be discussed or at least expose viewers of the show to as I would assume most viewers are from a younger audience.
Hi Isabelle,
ReplyDeleteI have yet to watch the newest of the Gossip Girl series; however, I enjoyed hearing about the similarities and differences between the new and original series and have been inspired to watch the reboot over winter break. Yes, there are many differences in the content of the series, including the increase use of technology in the reboot and the seemingly diversified cast; I agree that these differences can be (most times) attributed to the changing of times (advancement of technology and increased awareness/inclusivity of those who identify as LGBTQ+ and/or BIPOC.) However, I also wonder if the Gossip Girl series chose to be more inclusive, not just because of the "progressiveness" associated with the 21st century, but rather did it as a performative action (much like the ideas that we discussed pertaining to Banet-Weiser's popular feminism.) The individuals associated with the production of the series could be presenting a false image of what they actually believe in; the front stage self may be different than the backstage self of the individuals who wrote the newest rendition of the series. Like the student who commented above me, I also wonder if these "diversified" characters are given stereotypical personalities and character traits, much like what we discussed in past lectures . Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog post on Gossip Girl and am eager to watch the newest series to see what you have discussed in person; the juxtapositions of themes within the old and the new Gossip Girls were super informative, as well as some of the concepts you mentioned from our readings. Well done!
^Comment by Giselle Wagner
Delete
ReplyDeleteHi Isabelle! I think you did a wonderful job comparing the two television shows and the ways in which the new reboot of Gossip Girl has appropriately adapted to our contemporary context in 2021. I am currently watching the first Gossip Girl for the first time, but have not seen the reboot so the first is very fresh in my mind. I think your connection to Benjamin’s ideas is a very unique interpretation of the two shows that I would not have thought about, but it is clearly very important because technology plays a main role (and can even be thought about as another character) in both versions of the show. I believe you mentioned that the use of photos and videos on the Gossip Girl blog is very prevalent in the 2021 version but not in the 2007 version, and it may be more frequent in the 2021 version, but it definitely occurs in the earlier version as well. I attributed these constant use of photos and videos in an upper class society to the idea of surveillance, as discussed by Teju Cole. Cole examines photography as a means of violence and power, which appropriately applies to the very premise of the show as high schoolers are subject to constantly being watched and critically analyzed. Although Cole focused on a very different kind of photography, he made that point that “Photography’s future will be very much like it’s past. It will largely continue to illustrate, without condemning, how the powerful dominate the less powerful” (5). Especially in the reboot, when those surveilled are part of subordinate groups (people of color, part of the queer community, financially insecure, etc), Cole’s ideas hold true. The fact that there even was a reboot speaks to the fact that constant surveillance among communities has not just continued, it has been heightened and even more dangerous, resulting in the violence that Cole discusses. Overall, I think the comparison between these two shows and how they fit into popular culture is a highly complex discussion, and you brought up excellent points on the ways in which the reboot has updated an iconic piece of television.
Lia Della Porta
Hi Isabelle,
ReplyDeleteGreat job on this blog post! I really enjoyed reading what you had to say regarding comparisons between the original Gossip Girl and it’s recent and new reboot. Personally, I was a huge fan of the original Gossip Girl series, but I have yet to watch the new one out of fear it is not as good as the original. However, reading what you had to say about the new reboot has made me curious to give it a try. I liked how you were able to tie your analysis of the differences to the readings, especially to our readings on what Hall had to say about the concept of stereotypes. Although the original version of Gossip Girl is undoubtedly iconic, the lack of diversity is an issue; thus, I was worried the drastic increase in diversity in the reboot would enforce a shallow representation of each racial culture, gender, sexuality, social class, etc. However, evidently from your analysis, it seems these characters were well written enough to be able to defy the stereotypes for Asians, Blacks, bisexuals, even upper east siders, and create personas for themselves.
Additionally, I especially enjoyed reading about how you were able to tie what Benjamin discussed regarding technology and its effects on art to the use of technology in Gossip Girl. I was not aware the new Gossip Girl had adapted to today’s newer and more updated forms of technology, so I enjoyed hearing how these new advancements shaped photography, videography, and overall plotline of the television show. Technology is evidently always affecting how art is portrayed, and it will only continue to affect it as we enter the future.
- Rachel Ker