Skip to main content

Sarah Fingerhood Prompt #6

In the late 90s, the US was experiencing both immense technological advancements, with the recent advent of the Internet, and also growing social tension regarding race, gender, and sexuality. The American LGBQT community had just experienced the tragedy of the AIDS crisis in the 80s, which severely altered societal perception of queerness. At the same time, women were in the midst of third-wave feminism, which aimed to pushback on ideals of second-wave feminism through embracing sexuality, femininity, individuality, and attempting intersexuality. However, the Clinton presidency at this time was enacting a series of policies that catalyzed mass-incarceration. The examination of popular culture from this era illuminates how the public internalized or projected these rapidly changing power dynamics. Therefore, I analyzed TLC’s “No Scrubs” (1999) music video in conversation with Britney Spears’ “Oops...I Did It Again” (2000) to explore presentations of sexuality, gender, and race. I found that themes, imagery, and narrative in these music videos exemplify women’s paradox in the early 2000s as they tried to embrace feminism whilst still operating within the parameters of consumerist and patriarchal ideologies.

TLC and Britney Spears both attempt to display feminist ideals in the visual rejection of men and empowered sexualization through dress and dance. The entirety of TLC’s music video does not incorporate any men on-camera and Spears’ has an active rejection of the man when a male astronaut presents her with the “Heart of the Ocean,” the blue diamond from Titanic (1997), saying he retrieved it from the bottom of the ocean for her and she responds, “Oh, you shouldn’t have” (Spears, 2009). However, these active and passive rejections embody feminism in a similar fashion as “Girl Power,” which “offers girls a seductive blend of indepence, choice, and fun blended with heterosexual appeal: sassy, sexy, and smart” (Jackson et al., 2012). These music videos also present a sexualized fashioning of female bodies, such as tight jumpsuits or bra-tops, and seductive dancing, like grinding and self-touching. This exemplifies how “pop musicians who prevail in everyday lives, provide a rich source of meaning around sexuality” that is inextricably linked to consumer goods, such as sexualized clothing (Jackson et al., 2012). This portrayal of sexualized women is in conversation with third-wave feminism because it attempts to empower sexuality, however it dangerously alludes to consumption as a mode of achievement for feminism. 

Despite these attempts to liberate the female body through an agentic sexualization, the directors of both music videos are both male therefore representing the ubiquitous male gaze. The male gaze “positions women as no more than objects to be looked at, sexualized, and made vulnerable [so that] the male unconscious reassures itself that really it has nothing to fear of women” (Zeisler, 2008). In the introductory scene of “Oops!... I Did It Again,” the astronaut describes a photo of Spears as “cute” therefore inflicting the power dynamic of unthreatening cuteness, which ''[blurs] the boundaries between subject and object” (Dale, 2016). The depiction of cuteness is synonymous with an infantile innocence that present in both music videos’ display of all white outfits, which traditionally symbolize purity. For instance, TLC singer Chilli is seen on a massive swing donning all-white and minimal makeup in comparison to the two other singers. Similarly, in Spears’ video is spliced with scenes of her lying on a white platform in a matching white crop-top and mini-skirt. These depictions, filmed according to a male director, cast these women as pure, innocent, and simple therefore achieving the desired effect of the male gaze: powerless. 

The lyrics of both “No Scrubs” and “Oops!...I Did It Again” narrate women’s independence and agency in their sexuality as they disregard men, however layered examples of misogyny, heterosexuality, and consumerism eventually fulfills a rival cultural narrative. These videos succumb to the dilemma of “Girl Power’s ideology of powerful, smart, and independent girls “ which is rendered problematic during a “chaining of feminist accomplishments to a hyperfeminine, hypersexualized, [commodified], version of (post)feminity” (Jackson et al., 2012). Both music videos emulate this dilemma when they depict a feminist champion of sexual autonomy through rejecting men and therefore only regard heterosexual relationships. Moreover, through hypersexualized dancing and adornament of bodies these videos are dominated by hyperfemininity and hypersexualization. 

Nevertheless, in further comparison of these two music videos the fact that TLC consists of three women of color while Britney Spears is white is incredibly relevant to the discussion. In “No Scrubs,” TLC has multiple scenes that involve growling or kicking towards the camera while dressing up in colorful, vibrant, and complete makeup, which actively contrasts scenes of white simplicity and innocence. These scenes, when interwoven with moments like when Left-Eye prays at 2:52, display the multiplicity of women in society, especially women of color who battle stereotypes of aggression (TLC, 2014). Similar to Yael Levy’s analysis of The Real Housewives’ franchise, contrasting scenes “create a chronicle of variations on feminine performance, changing in accordance to social circumstances, thus emphasizing the constructedness of feminine performance” (Levy, 2018). The TLC music video ends with the women laughing and fake fighting as if it is captured behind-the-scenes footage, which may further illuminate the constructedness of media industry and emphasize a distinction between the music video and reality. This is compared to Britney Spears’ video that avoids any allusion to violence or aggression. Therefore, these two videos communicate ideals of the early 2000s regarding an acceptable and non-threatening display of heterosexual and commodified feminism, however a subversive and intertextual reading leaves room for a hegemmonic interpretation in which the multiple and sometimes competeing demands of feminity are mocked. 

Bibliography
1.Jackson, S., Vares, T., & Gill, R. (2012). ‘The whole playboy mansion image’: Girls’
fashioning and fashioned selves within a postfeminist culture. Feminism & Psychology, 23(2), 143–162. doi: 10.1177/0959353511433790

2. Spears, B. (2009, October 25). Britney Spears- Oops!... I Did It Again (Official Video). Retrieved November 12, 2019, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CduA0TULnow.

3. Zeisler, A. (2008). Feminism and pop culture. Berkeley, Calif: Seal Press. 

4. Dale, J. P. (2016). Cute studies: An emerging field. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2
(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1386/eapc.2.1.5_2

5. TLC. (2014, January 31). Tlc- No Scrubs (Official Video) . Retrieved November 12, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrLequ6dUdM. 

6. Levy, Y. (2018). Serial Housewives: The Feminist Resistance of The Real Housewives’ Matrixial Structre. Continuum, 32:3, 370-380, DOI: 10.1080/10304312.2018.1450492

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Olufikemi Ogunyankin Prompt #5

Kendrick Lamar’s Camp Eye for the ‘Other’ Kendrick Lamar is an award winning African-American rapper and songwriter, who distinguishes himself from his peers by transforming his raw life experiences into pieces of art. His music videos for Alright and ELEMENT. convey the patterns of Afro-surrealism, transformation of trauma and Black perservance. Coined by Amiri Baraka, Afro-surrealism is the “skill at creating an entirely different world organically connected to this one ... the Black aesthetic in its actual contemporary and lived life” (p.p. 164-165). It is how Black creatives present the larger-than-life experience of racism in a way that is shocking and doesn’t seem real. This concept, integrally shared by the two videos, will be discussed in the context of the ideas of Stuart Hall and Susan Sontag. In chapter 4 of Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, Hall discusses “regime[s] of representation,” which are the “visual effects through which ‘difference’...

Tamara Wurman Prompt #1

What the Fork?: The Good Place as a Hybrid of High and Low Culture Eleanor Shelstrop lived a terrible life and behaved, by most standards, immorally. When she dies, she finds herself mistakenly in “The Good Place” (think: heaven) as a result of a clerical error. In an attempt to avoid being sent to her actual afterlife destination, the aptly named “Bad Place”, Eleanor asks one of her friends to teach her how to be a good person. So the show thus follows Eleanor as she tries to learn moral philosophy posthumously so she can fit in in the good place without being discovered as someone who doesn’t belong. While I could go on about the entertaining plot twists of Michael Schur’s NBC sitcom, The Good Place , and the hilarious, nail-biting inter-character dynamics, the philosophical undertones of the show also mark a fascinating intersection between “high” and “low” culture. Particularly in the scenes where the characters directly engage with well-renowned philosophi...

Srinidhi Ramakrishna Prompt #2

Srinidhi Ramakrishna Professor Lingel COMM 123 9 October 2019 Drag Ball Slang in the Mainstream             The revitalization of underground drag ball culture in the 1970s and 1980s provided queer communities of color a space to safely play with norms of gender and sexuality without fear. In an era when the AIDS crisis was ravaging LGBT populations and discrimination against the queer and mainly young Black and Latinx ball participants was embedded into US society, the ball scene was – and continues to be – rooted in resistance. The highly ritualized subculture has its own intricate structure. Grinnell College’s “Underground Ball Culture” (n.d.) describes how in balls, competitors ‘walk’ against one another in categories to win prizes, doing things like dancing, strutting, or spoken word. Categories often play with exaggeration and reality. From a common category, “Realness” (how well can competitors b...