Skip to main content

Nathalie Marquez Prompt #4

We are living in the media age of the remake. One glance at the assembly line of Disney live actions and TV reboots is sufficient enough to recognize this fact. Therefore, it was no surprise when Luca Guadagnino, the Italian director of Call Me by Your Name, directed a 2018 reimagining of the 1977 horror cult class, Suspiria, starring Tilda Swinton and Dakota Johnson. Both films center around a oung, white woman attending a prestigious dance academy in Germany that is secretly run by witches, but that’s about where the similarities end. Despite lacking Suspiria’s (2018) intense dance sequences and extra hour of footage, Suspiria (1977) proves that often times, less is more by successfully telling the story it set out to at the beginning.

A Tale of Two Artists

The most notable difference between Guadagnino’s and Argento’s version of Suspiria is the color palettes chosen for each film. The 1977 version featured a bold palette with a heavy emphasis on bright red as a representation of the malignant coven of witches while the 2018 version was almost completely devoid of color, instead opting for a palette of beige and grey. Perhaps Guadagnino made this choice believing the dull lighting and clothing would allow the select usages of red, such as Dakota Johnson’s hair and the dancers’ outfits, to stand out, but if so, he severely underestimated just how draining his chosen palette would be on these details. In contrast, Suspiria (1977) succeeded in creating a tense, realistic atmosphere of fear through its emphasis on color, albeit using the color red to represent evil and the color white to represent our heroine weren’t exactly revolutionary. 

However, Guadagnino did beautifully utilize the dance school setting of the movie to transform the human body dancing into a thing of contortion and horror, in a way the 1977 version did not attempt. Guadagnino’s usage of dance as a violent and raw demonstration of power transforms the human body from a thing of universal familiarity into a strange instrument of witchcraft, successfully demonstrating the concept of ambitious art (Lethem, 2012). This aura of horror is partly credited to the thinness of the dancers’ bodies as their movements starkly reveal the impressions of their entire ribcages against their skin as well as their flexibility, contorting in ways most people would find ainful. In comparison, Argento’s version features little more than a saute, instead creating its horror through the usage of traditional horror props such as maggots and barbed wire. This method is equally as effective in replicating an atmosphere of fear but is arguably less innovative and awe-inspiring to watch.

Feminist Façade 

Furthermore, while both versions of this cult classic feature a largely female cast and a female protagonist, neither successfully manage to entirely evade misogyny in their portrayals of women. In the 1977 version, the male gaze is more easily identifiable through the heavy usage of dramatic makeup at all times, even in a scene where the actresses are swimming, as well as the portrayal of the coven being composed of “ugly”, older women (Zeisler, 2008). The implication that powerful women are malignant, and grotesque is apparent from the get-go, while Guadagnino’s coven features a more varied assortment of women. However, Guadagnino doesn’t get a pass, as in his film, the young and “beautiful” protagonist, ends up being the most powerful out of all the witches. The two films contained inverse extremes, with neither managing to strike a balance that successfully undermines the association of feminine power with youth and beauty, but instead reflected different waves of feminism. Suspiria (1977) was released in the era of second-wave feminism, where issues of inequality and discrimination were still center stage, and thus the film chose to empower its heroine through the traditional triumph of good vs. evil. In contrast, Suspiria (2018) was released deep into the age of third-wave feminism where the issue of intersectionality reigns supreme, and therefore, its portrayal of a violent, all-powerful white woman falls flat of feeling feminist. Therefore, both of these films are also examples of Zeisler’s argument that representation in the media doesn’t always advocate or advance feminist viewpoints, despite the quantity of women portrayed (2008). 

Convoluted History

All in all, both Suspiria(1977) and Suspiria (2018) have their fair share of failings, but it’s my belief that what truly elevates Suspiria (1977) above Suspiria (2018) is that the former does not attempt to add an extra layer of history to its tale. Guadagnino’s version makes an ambitious attempt to intertwine the ramifications of post-Nazi Germany to the occult on-goings at the dance academy in a messy and weak parallel. On the other hand, Argento, an Italian director born during the World War II, could have felt that including the post-Nazi atmosphere occurring in Germany at the time was too risky a move, while Guadagnino benefitted from the buffer of time. Be that as it may, Guadagnino also incorporated a Mennonite background for his protagonist while Argento chose to give his female protagonist no background beside her nationality as an American. While I could conjure a dozen of different reasons for this action, the truth remains that Argento’s version is made cleaner by his decision to focus entirely on a linear, singular plot while Guadagnino’s muddy attempts at historical context add nothing to the story but detract from its overall quality instead.

Denouement

From ambitious art to historical context, both movies have a variety of failings and successes, each one derived from the artistic vision of their respective directors as well as the eras they originated from. Did Suspiria (2018) have truly mesmerizing scenes of bodily contortion? Was the acting in Suspiria (1977) painful to watch at moments? Yes, but the ultimately, it’s the quality of the story that decides its worth and Suspiria (1977) never once questions itself the way Suspiria (2018) does continuously throughout its tale.


References
Argento, C. & Argento, D. (1977). Suspiria [Motion Picture]. Italy: Seda Spettacolli

Lethem, J. (2012, December 2). The ecstasy of influence: Harper's Magazine - Part 3. https://harpers.org/archive/2007/02/the-ecstasy-of-influence/3/.
Morabito, M. & Guadagnino, L. (2018) [Motion Picture]. United States: Amazon Studios
Zeisler, A. (2008) Feminism and pop culture. Seattle, WA: Seal Press

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sarahi Franco-Morales - Beyond the Meme: Understanding the Latine Vote

The 2024 election results disappointed Harris supporters and Donald Trump opponents. What surprised me most was the shift in Latine voters. I didn’t need the news to dramatize this; my TikTok was flooded with videos of Latines expressing their disappointment. An example on the left reads: “Apparently, most of our generation 3 forgot everything our parents had to go through,” showing what many Latines would feel connected to. As a daughter of immigrants, this broke my heart. Sharing it with my Latina roommate, whose feed mirrored mine, we felt embarrassed by our generation's political shift. Over time, the videos became vengeful memes against the Latine Trump supporters, portraying the community as disconnected from its roots. But as I scrolled, I realized this couldn’t be the whole story—Latines for Harris existed too. Yes, as a Latina who doesn’t see Trump as an ally to the Latine or the immigrant community (valuable to the United States), it was disappointing to see 45% of Hispan...

Jessica Bobman Prompt #4

Hannah Meloche, a 20-year-old from Michigan, has always loved being in front of the camera, first joining YouTube in 2013 (The Fact Ninja, 2018). After finding a love for video making, she continued to create content, and her following has grown significantly ever since (Hanson-Firestone, 2020). She currently has over 2 million subscribers and has even created her own jewelry line, known as Starlite Village (Weiss, 2019). Because of YouTube, Hannah Meloche has also grown her image by becoming a model and brand ambassador for several different brands (Hanson-Firestone, 2020). Meloche’s channel consists of video logs, or vlogs, that show her everyday life as well as her love for fashion and beauty. Videos of her everyday life include content of her eating, walking, and relaxing (Meloche, 2021). While vlogs can take several days to edit, Hannah is consistently able to post a video once a week, keeping her fans engaged. Meloche’s audience consists of young teen girls, evidenced through her...

Lily Grace - Chappel Roan Fans Stay Loyal After Last-Minute Cancellation

Chappel Roan dropped out of the sold-out All Things Go music festival on Friday, September 27th, the day before headlining. But did her fans lash out? No, they flooded her with love! This is because they support her taking care of her mental health, a fanbase switch in popular culture that must continue.  This outcome is shocking when we consider how celebrities have been treated historically. Graeme Turner in Approaching Celebrity Studies discusses the idea of celebrity as industry. He argues they become a product that “can be manufactured, marketed and traded – and not only by the promotions, publicity and media industries” (Turner, 2014, p. 14). The human is lost in the business, seen only as a commodity to churn out revenue. Considering only the productivity of a creator, canceling a sold-out show last minute would be inexcusable. But, fanbase culture has shifted in the way that they consider celebrity humanity. So, Roan’s fanbase sticking by her side despite the sudden break m...